2012 International Occupational Therapy Conference
         Open all | Close all

 

Your position: Main page Feedback survey Overall survey result

 

Feedback survey - Overall Survey result

 

24 - 26 February, 2012

"2012 International Occupational Therapy Conference"
Feedback survey analysis  

The conference organizer received 132 copies of feedback questionnaires.

下载 Download Feedback survey analysis xls Document    下载 Download Feedback survey analysispdf 文檔

 

  Delegates's Personal Particulars

1.

Which country/area do you come from?

 

 

No. of respondents:

132

  

Country

No.

%

Mainland China

52

39%

Hong Kong

62

47%

Taiwan

8

6%

Macau

2

2%

Singapore

1

1%

Australia

1

1%

Malaysia

1

1%

UK

1

1%

USA

1

1%

Philippines

2

2%

Others

1

1%

Which country/area do you come from?

 

2.

What are your profession/ career ?

 

 

No. of respondent:

130

 

profession

No.

%

Occupational therapist

79

61%

Physiotherapist

1

1%

Nurse（Therapist

1

1%

Prosthetist and Orthotist

0

0%

Rehab Therapist

11

8%

Rehab Doctor

15

12%

Other Rehab Practitioner

0

0%

Lecturer/Professor

6

5%

Others ( TCM Practitioner)

17

13%

What are your profession/ career ?

 

3.

What is the nature of your work place?

 

 

No. of respondent:

129

 

Workplace

No.

%

General Hospital

51

39%

Rehab Hospital

21

16%

Community Rehab Centre

15

12%

Children Hospital

2

2%

School

13

10%

Others  (* Remarks)

27

21%

What is the nature of your work place?

*Remarks:

Note*: Specialty Hospital, Government ( Social Welfare Dept), Psychiatric Hospital , Sheltered Workshop, Child Care Centre. Pre-school Centre, Out Patient Private Clinic, Elderly Care and Attention Home , Teaching Institution

 

4.

How many years of experience do you have in your present work post?

 

 

No. of respondent:

127

 

Working Experience

No.

%

Less than 1 year

16

13%

1 to 5 years

44

34%

6 to 10 years

29

23%

11 to 15 years

17

13%

Above 15 years

21

17%

How many years of experience do you have in your present work post?

 


 Pre-conference & Conference arrangement

5.

Pre-conference organization

 

5.1

Registration

 

 

No. of respondent:

113

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

28

25%

4 Satisfied

67

59%

3 No comment

11

10%

2 Dissatisfied

5

4%

1 Very Dissatisfied

2

2%

Registration

5.2

Announcement

 

 

No. of respondent:

99

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

Very Satisfied

22

22%

4 Satisfied

55

56%

3 No comment

15

15%

2 Dissatisfied

5

5%

1 Very Dissatisfied

2

2%

 

Announcement

5.3

Registration Fee

 

 

No. of respondent:

126

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

Very Satisfied

42

33%

4 Satisfied

51

41%

3 No comment

32

25%

2 Dissatisfied

1

1%

1 Very Dissatisfied

0

0%

 

Registration Fee

5. Summary of Satisfaction on Pre-conference organization

 

 

　

Average

Registration

4.01

Announcement

3.91

Registration Fee

4.06

Summary of Satisfaction on Pre-conference organization

 

6.

Conference arrangement

6.1

On-site Registration

 

 

No. of respondent:

118

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

 55

46%

4 Satisfied

 47

40%

3 No comment

 13

11%

2 Dissatisfied

 3

3%

1 Very Dissatisfied

 0

0%

On-site Registration

6.2

Programme Rundown

 

 

No. of respondent:

132

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

 53

40%

4 Satisfied

 64

48%

3 No comment

 13

10%

2 Dissatisfied

 2

2%

1 Very Dissatisfied

 0

0%

Programme Rundown

6.3

Venue

 

 

No. of respondent:

132

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

 51

39%

4 Satisfied

 55

41%

3 No comment

 22

17%

2 Dissatisfied

 4

3%

1 Very Dissatisfied

 0

0%

Venue

6.4

Audio & Visual Effect

 

 

No. of respondent:

132

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

 47

36%

4 Satisfied

 67

51%

3 No comment

 15

11%

2 Dissatisfied

 2

2%

1 Very Dissatisfied

 1

1%

Audio & Visual Effect

6.5

Programs Brochures/Abstracts

 

 

No. of respondent:

132

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

 48

36%

4 Satisfied

 62

47%

3 No comment

 19

14%

2 Dissatisfied

 1

1%

1 Very Dissatisfied

 2

2%

Programs Brochures/Abstracts

 

 

6. Summary of Satisfaction on Conference Arrangement

 

 

　

Average

Onsite Registration

4.31

Programme Rundown

4.27

Venue

4.16

Audio & Visual Effect

4.19

Programs Brochures and Abstract

4.16

Summary of Satisfaction on Conference Arrangement

 

  7. Symposium : Please select the keynote speeches (not more than 2) which you found most interested in and useful:

Keynote Speech 1

Occupational Therapy in School-aged Children with Specific Learning Difficulties

Keynote Speech 2

How Rehabilitation Sciences Meets with Practice of Occupational Therapy: Enhancing Learning Potential of People with Disability?

Keynote Speech 3

Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, Challenges, Strategies and Leadership Opportunities

Keynote Speech 4

Evidence for Neuroplasticity: Implications and Complications for OT Practice in Neurorehabilitation

Keynote Speech 5

Advanced Technology to Enhance Upper Limb Function and Quality of Life

Keynote Speech 6

New Frontiers of Occupational Therapy in Primary Care in Hong Kong

 

 

No. of respondent:

132

keynote Speech Preference

No.

Keynote Speech 1

47

Keynote Speech 2

39

Keynote Speech 3

17

Keynote Speech 4

62

Keynote Speech 5

51

Keynote Speech 6

10

Symposium : Please select the keynote speeches (not more than 2) which you found most interested in and useful

 

  8. Please select the programs (not more than 2) with specific theme in Children / Aging & Well Being / Upper Limb Function & QOL,
      Physical Health / Mental Health / Occupational Life Style Redesign , which you found most interested in and useful

 

 

No. of respondent:

132

keynote Speech Preference

No.

Children

47

Ageing and Well Being

28

Upper Limb & Technology

53

Physical Health

43

Mental Health

38

Occupational Lifestyle Redesign

29

Summary of Satisfaction on Conference Arrangement

 

9.

Free Paper

11.1

9.1 Relevance

 

 

No. of respondent:

126

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

35

28%

4 Satisfied

70

56%

3 No comment

20

16%

2 Dissatisfied

 0

0%

1 Very Dissatisfied

1

1%

Relevance

9.2

Academic level

 

 

No. of respondent:

128

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

40

31%

4 Satisfied

68

53%

3 No comment

18

14%

2 Dissatisfied

 1

1%

1 Very Dissatisfied

1

1%

Academic level

9.3

Skills / Techniques

 

 

No. of respondent:

126

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

%

5 Very Satisfied

31

25%

4 Satisfied

65

52%

3 No comment

25

20%

2 Dissatisfied

 4

3%

1 Very Dissatisfied

1

1%

Skills / Techniques

9. Summary of Satisfaction on Free Paper

 

 

　

Average

Relevance

 4.1

Academic level

 4.13

Skills / Techniques

 3.96

Free paper sessions - Summary

 

 Other opinions

10.

On the whole, are you satisfied with this conference?

 

 

No. of respondent:

132

 

Level of Satisfaction

No.

100%

5 Very Satisfied

33

25%

4 Satisfied

89

67%

3 No comment

8

6%

2 Dissatisfied

1

1%

Very Dissatisfied

1

1%

On the whole, are you satisfied with this conference?

 

11.

Will you participate in similar Occupational Therapy Conference in future?

 

 

No. of respondent:

129

 

Reply

No.

%

Yes

 122 95%

No

 1 1%

Not certain

6 5%

Will you join such similar occupational therapy conference in the future?

 

12.

Will you recommend your colleagues to attend similar Occupational Therapy Conference in future?

 

 

No. of respondent:

127

 

Response

No.

%

Yes

 119 94.0%

No

 1 1%

Not certain

7 6%

Will you recommend your colleagues to attend similar Occupational Therapy Conference in future?

 

18.

Other opinions:

 

 

 

 

Opinions:

 

01.

The program rundown are too long. The venues are so scattered . Too far apart of some venues.

02.

It would be great to organze interest group on some topics that ran together at same time were of interested to me ,however it was hard to attend both as they happened together . Would be great if talk could be arranged more space out

03.

The days are started too early

04.

ok

05.

希望以后在国内开办 方便

06.

场地相离太远，费时太多很难找到

07.

很好，继续开办

08.

ok

09.

meeting for interest groups children, elderly stroke

10.

场地相隔太远

11.

主题演讲，内容都特别好，专题演讲的速度很快，理解有些困难，加上不同意录相和拍照，收获不大

12.

提供讨论机会，综合多专业

13.

the venue of each symposium Is far from each other

14.

chairs for keynote speech are not enough

15.

会议讲论材料希望可以得到，项目合作的意向是指导方式

16.

really waiting for publications for Assessment of secondary school

17.

thank you

18.

总的来说本次会议的举办是非常成功的，非常希望能参加所有讨座，可惜同时有5个讲座开始，要是能提供图像资料或其它相关资料的话，那就太完美了。

19.

Asian speakers focused on general only , expert presenter were more in depth

20.

This conference was suitable for students, public, parents , not all information is very general

21.

Will speaker PowerPoint presentation in PDF File and put in the website of the conference to share later

22.

keep the schedule and keep track of time the air conditioning were too cold hurting muscles at the end of the day)-check the quality of the speakers; it's an international congress, so if you want to attract people from overseas, the presentations have to be in good quality

Back to top