Open all | Close all

Your position: Main page Feedback survey Overall survey result

 

Feedback survey - Overall Survey result

 

14 to 17 November, 2008

"2008 International Occupational Therapy Conference"
Feedback survey analysis  

There were total 225 delegates registered to join the conference (including speakers), the conference organizer received 92 no. of completed feedback questionnaires, the response rate is 40.9%.
The questionnaires were distributed in both Chinese and English, the questions and contents were the same.

下载 Download Original feedback questionnaire pdf document    下载 Download Feedback survey analysis xls Document    下载 Download Feedback survey analysispdf 文檔

 

 

Date of complete questionnaire

 

 

No. of respondent:

64

Date

No.

14 November, 2009

2

15 November, 2009

9

16 November, 2009

35

17 November, 2009

18

Date of complete questionnaire

 

 Delegate's information

 

Date of attendance

 

 

Date of attendance

No.

14 November, 2009

45

15 November, 2009

46

16 November, 2009

49

17 November, 2009

30

Not answer this question

41

Date of attendance

 

1.

Where did you come from?

 

 

No. of respondent:

92

  

Response

No.

100%

China (* Remarks)

55

59.8%

Hong Kong

26

28.3%

Taiwan

4

4.3%

Macau

2

2.2%

Australia

1

1.1%

U.K.

1

1.1%

U.S.A.

3

3.3%

Where did you come from?

*Remarks:

China: Beijing (3), Chongqing Province (2), Jilin Province (6), Sichuan Province (12), Guangdong Province (9), Henan Province (2), Gansu Province (2), Yunnan Province (6), Hebei Province (1), Hunan Province (1)、Shandong Province (1)、Fujian Province (2), Province was not indicated (8)

 

2.

What is your profession?

 

 

No. of respondent:

92

 

Response

No.

100%

Occupational therapist

49

53.3%

Physiotherapist

1

1.1%

Nurse

1

1.1%

Rehabilitation therapist

6

6.5%

Doctor (Rehabilitation)

13

14.1%

Teacher

1

1.1%

Other rehabilitation professional

2

2.2%

Student

6

6.5%

College/university instructor/professor

7

7.6%

Hospital/Organization administrator

1

1.1%

Doctor (Other specialty) (* Remarks)

5

5.4%

What is your profession?

*Remarks:

Doctor (Other specialty) - Orthopaedics & traumatology (1), Orthopaedics (2), Endocrinology (1), Specialty was not indicated (1)

 

3.

What is the type of your working organization?

 

 

No. of respondent:

92

 

Response

No.

100%

Integrated hospital

38

41.3%

Rehabilitation hospital

17

18.5%

Community rehabilitation center

9

9.8%

School/College

6

6.5%

University

15

16.3%

Others  (* Remarks)

7

7.6%

What is the type of your working organization?

*Remarks:

Others - Disabled Person's Federation (2), Government (1), Rehabilitation for autistic children (1), Occupational Health Company (1), N.G.O. (Children with special needs) (1), Paediatric (1)

 

 Conference’s organization & arrangement

4.

Pre-conference organization

4.1

Enrollment & registration

Average marks:

4.44

 

 

No. of respondent:

89

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

50

56.2%

4 marks

28

31.5%

3 marks

11

12.4%

2 marks

0

0.0%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

0

0.0%

Enrollment & registration

4.2

Conference news

Average marks:

4.28

 

 

No. of respondent:

88

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

42

47.7%

4 marks

31

35.2%

3 marks

14

15.9%

2 marks

0

0.0%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

1

1.1%

 

Conference news

4.3

Conference registration fee

Average marks:

4.21

 

 

No. of respondent:

84

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 37 44.0%

4 marks

 29 34.5%

3 marks

 17 20.2%

2 marks

 1 1.2%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 0 0.0%

Conference registration fee

Pre-conference organization - Summary:

 

 

　

Average

Enrollment & registration

4.44

Conference news

4.28

Conference registration fee

4.21

Pre-conference organization - Summary

 

5.

Conference arrangement

5.1

Registration arrangement

Average marks:

4.33

 

 

No. of respondent:

85

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 44

51.8%

4 marks

 28

32.9%

3 marks

 10

11.8%

2 marks

 3

3.5%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 0

0.0%

Registration arrangement

5.2

Length of conference period

Average marks:

4.28

 

 

No. of respondent:

89

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 35

39.3%

4 marks

 45

50.6%

3 marks

 8

9.0%

2 marks

 1

1.1%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 0

0.0%

Length of conference period

5.3

Programme rundown

Average marks:

4.38

 

 

No. of respondent:

88

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 44 50.0%

4 marks

 35 39.8%

3 marks

 7 8.0%

2 marks

 2 2.3%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 0 0.0%

Programme rundown

5.4

Venue

Average marks:

4.39

 

 

No. of respondent:

87

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 45

51.7%

4 marks

 32

36.8%

3 marks

 9

10.3%

2 marks

 1

1.1%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 0

0.0%

Venue

5.5

Audio and visual effect

Average marks:

4.28

 

 

No. of respondent:

88

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 40

45.5%

4 marks

 35

39.8%

3 marks

 12

13.6%

2 marks

 0

0.0%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 1

1.1%

Audio and visual effect

5.6

Conference proceedings

Average marks:

4.22

 

 

No. of respondent:

87

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 39 44.8%

4 marks

 33 37.9%

3 marks

 12 13.8%

2 marks

 1 1.1%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 2 2.3%

Conference proceedings

5.7

Hospital visit

Average marks:

4.37

 

 

No. of respondent:

62

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 30

48.4%

4 marks

 26

41.9%

3 marks

 5

8.1%

2 marks

 1

1.6%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 0

0.0%

Hospital visit

5.8

Scholarship

Average marks:

4.29

 

 

No. of respondent:

58

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 25 43.1%

4 marks

 26 44.8%

3 marks

 6 10.3%

2 marks

 1 1.7%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 0 0.0%

Scholarship

 

 

Conference arrangement - Summary:

 

 

　

Average

Registration arrangement

4.33

Length of conference period

4.28

Programme rundown

4.38

Venue

4.39

Audio and Visual effect

4.28

Conference proceedings

4.22

Hospital visit

4.37

Scholarship

4.29

Conference arrangement - Summary

 

 Scientific Programme

6.

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Plenary sessions which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

P1:

Occupational therapy education in Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan – Development and future challenge

P2:

OT's contribution during and after disaster

P3:

New techniques and development in occupational therapy

P4:

Development of occupational therapy in the community

 

 

No. of respondent:

88

Chosen session

No.

P1

40

P2

34

P3

55

P4

34

2 topics from the Plenary sessions which you interested most and was/were practical to you

7.

Please choose at most 3 topics from the Symposium sessions which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

 

I have not attended any symposium session

A:

Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation

B:

Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery

C:

Occupational therapy in paediatric rehabilitation

D:

Occupational therapy education

E:

Community occupational therapy

F:

Vocational rehabilitation

G:

Experience sharing on rehabilitation & occupational therapy after Sichuan earthquake

H:

Sharing of experience by overseas occupational therapists working in Mainland China

 

 

No. of respondent:

88

Chosen session

No.

Not attend

 1
A 41
B 26
C 32
D 29
E 34
F 20
G 29
H 12

Please choose at most 3 topics from the Symposium sessions which you interested most and was/were practical to you

8.

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Symposium sessions “(A) Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

 

I have not attended any symposium session of “(A) Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation”

S1A:

Assessment in Neuro-rehabilitation

S2A:

Management of hemiplegic upper limb

S3A:

Functional training in neuro-rehabilitation

S4A:

Cognitive-perceptual training in neuro-rehabilitation

 

 

No. of respondent:

84

Chosen session

No.

Not attend

 24
S1A 20
S2A 30
S3A 23
S4A 25

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Symposium sessions “(A) Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

9.

Please choose 1 topic from the Symposium sessions “(B) Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

 

I have not attended any symposium session of “(B) Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery”

S1B:

Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery (1)

S2B:

Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery (2)

S3B:

Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery (3)

 

 

No. of respondent:

82

Chosen session

No.

Not attend

 46
S1B 20
S2B 14
S3B 7

Please choose 1 topic from the Symposium sessions “(B) Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

10.

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Symposium sessions “(C) Occupational therapy in paediatric rehabilitation” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

 

I have not attended any symposium session of “(A) Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation”

S1C:

Occupational therapy functional training for children

S2C:

Community integration for children

S3C:

Sensory integrative therapy

S4C:

Rehabilitation in Paediatric

 

 

No. of respondent:

85

Chosen session

No.

Not attend

 33
S1C 33
S2C 16
S3C 20
S4C 19

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Symposium sessions “(C) Occupational therapy in paediatric rehabilitation” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

 

11.

Free paper sessions

11.1

Appropriateness

Average marks:

4.16

 

 

No. of respondent:

82

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 31

37.8%

4 marks

 35

42.7%

3 marks

 15

18.3%

2 marks

 0

0.0%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 1

1.2%

Appropriateness

11.2

Academic level

Average marks:

4.16

 

 

No. of respondent:

82

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 34

41.5%

4 marks

 30

36.6%

3 marks

 16

19.5%

2 marks

 1

1.2%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 1

1.2%

Academic level

11.3

Presentation skills

Average marks:

3.98

 

 

No. of respondent:

82

 

Marks

No.

100%

5 marks (Very satisfactory)

 27 32.9%

4 marks

 32 39.0%

3 marks

 18 22.0%

2 marks

 4 4.9%

1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)

 1 1.2%

Presentation skills

Free paper sessions - Summary:

 

 

　

Average

Appropriateness

 4.16

Academic level

 4.16

Presentation skills

 3.98

Free paper sessions - Summary

 

12.

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Post-conference workshops which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

 

I have not attended any post-conference workshops

W2:

Establishment of an occupational therapy unit for hand rehabilitation

W3:

Enhancing the independent living skills for children with autism

W4:

Swallowing assessment and training

W5:

Splintage for peripheral nerve injuries of hands

W6:

Seating system

 

 

No. of respondent:

82

Chosen session

No.

Not attend

 36
W2 18
W3 21
W4 16
W5 17
W6 10

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Post-conference workshops which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

13.

Have you joined the hospital visits?

 

I have not joined any hospital visit.

V1:

15/11 - University City Hospital of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, & The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

V2:

17/11 - Guangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Center

 

 

No. of respondent:

84

Chosen session

No.

Not attend

 50
V1 25
V2 12

Have you joined the hospital visits?

 

 Other opinions

14.

Overall satisfaction level?

 

 

No. of respondent:

86

 

Response

No.

100%

Satisfactory

80

93.0%

No opinion

5

5.8%

Not satisfactory

1

1.2%

Overall satisfaction level?

 

15.

How and where did you know about this conference?

 

 

No. of respondent:

71

 

 

 

Opinions:

 

01.

From colleagues.

02.

E-mail.

03.

网络。

04.

香港职业治疗学院网站。

05.

Invited to attend.

06.

单位提供。

07.

报到通知。

08.

From my department manager.

09.

Email.

10.

Colleagues.

11.

吉林省慈善总会。

12.

E-mail.

13.

中华慈善总会。

14.

收到通知资料（但有些晚）

15.

中华物理医学康复网站、中国康复医学会网站。

16.

Email from OT friends.

17.

老师介绍。

18.

老师宣传。

19.

Email.

20.

By E-mail & invitation.

21.

老师通知。

22.

老师。

23.

中华慈善总会。

24.

E-mail / Colleagues.

25.

网站。

26.

Colleagues, circulation

27.

网上信息。

28.

网站。

29.

中华慈善总会。

30.

慈善总会通知。

31.

中华慈善总会通知。

32.

通知。

33.

from HKOTA.

34.

Hospital.

35.

HKOTA.

36.

医院通知。

37.

Well-organized.

38.

from professor's suggestion.

39.

接到邀请函。

40.

I knew about this conference from my colleagues in our hospital.

41.

My hospital give me the information.

42.

Internet.

43.

APOT.

44.

Over internet.

45.

From internet.

46.

通过香港职业治疗学院、中华慈善总会。

47.

From MOTA.

48.

HKIOT & Leung Kwok-fai

49.

吉林省慈善总会。

50.

e-mail, website.

51.

吉林省慈善总会通知。

52.

吉林省慈善总会。

53.

From my advisor.

54.

From the HKIOT website & through my supervisor.

55.

Internet.

56.

从同仁中得知。

57.

Through e-mail.

58.

From first conference.

59.

吉林省慈善总会。

60.

Invited / sponsor.

61.

传真数据和电话。

62.

第二届北京康复国际论坛参会会场发的通知。

63.

通过网络通知。

64.

大会通知。

65.

慈善会通知。

66.

香港职业治疗学院。

67.

老师告知。

68.

通过香港职业治疗学会。

69.

通过香港职业治疗学院。

70.

通过香港职业治疗学院。

71.

联网。

 

16.

Will you join such similar occupational therapy conference in the future?

 

 

No. of respondent:

87

 

Response

No.

100%

Yes

 76 87.4%

No